Known Good Sample PCBAs for test fixture/program validation (3 minimum).Updated documentation that was provided for quote if applicable.This information is in addition to the information provided for quoting and must be the current revision. Required Information/materials for test fixture development and fabrication.Panelized or Individual boards? (if panelized how many boards per panel).Testpoint sizes (larger targets are more accurate and cost less to make contact).Testpoint Coverage Report (optional but beneficial for accuracy of quote).Test Point Location (topside, bottom side or both).List of any special considerations for test.If some of these previous element is missing then we need : CAD files in a Fabmaster compatible format (ASCII).Requested Information for Providing Quotes :.TERADYNE Z1800 (ZEHNTEL) et AEROFLEX 4220 (IFR).Ĭustomer must provide information/materials for test fixture development : We provide you rich and customisable offers on our testers :ĪGILENT 3070, TERADYNE TS124LH (Genrad ), TERADYNE SPECTRUM The advantages of in situ test are a very high test coverage rate, a precise diagnosis and a speed of test adapted to strong volumes of production. ICT usually requires the manufacture of a test fixture specific to the PCB. In-Circuit Test (ICT) allows the manufacturer to verify the operation and electrical connection of discrete devices soldered on the PCB, allowing faults to be located and rectified quickly. Traditional and efficient approaches to the test of assembled boards have relied on making physical contact with testpoints on the board surface. The manufacture of double-sided boards densely packed with very fine pitch devices is complex, as is the identification of faults on these boards. The complexity of Printed Circuit Boards (PCBs) has increased dramatically with the use of surface-mount technology.